Senate falls short of halting Trump’s $23B arms sales to UAE

Politics

In this Aug. 5, 2019, photo released by the U.S. Air Force, an F-35 fighter jet pilot and crew prepare for a mission at Al-Dhafra Air Base in the United Arab Emirates. The Trump administration has formally notified Congress that it plans to sell 50 advanced F-35 fighter jets to the United Arab Emirates as part of a broader arms deal worth more than $23 billion. (Staff Sgt. Chris Thornbury/U.S. Air Force via AP)

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Senate fell short Wednesday in trying to halt the Trump administration’s proposed $23 billion arms sales to the United Arab Emirates, despite bipartisan objections to the package of F-35 fighter jets and drones stemming from a broader Middle East peace agreement.

Senators argued the sale of the defense equipment, which Secretary of State Mike Pompeo formally authorized last month after the Abraham Accords normalizing relations with Israel, was unfolding too quickly and with too many questions. The administration has billed it as a way to deter Iran, but UAE would become the first Arab nation — and only the second country in the Middle East, after Israel — to possess the stealth warplanes.

“Can a lasting peace be purchased with more weapons?” said Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., in a speech ahead of the vote.

Congress has shown a willingness to confront Trump in one main area — on defense policy. But on Wednesday the effort to turn back the arms sales failed to reach the 51-vote majority needed for passage. Trump was expected to veto the two resolutions anyway.

The showdown over the sale, alongside sweeping bipartisan support for the annual defense bill despite Trump’s threats to veto it, is potentially a final power play between the executive and legislative branch in the final weeks of Trump’s presidency. The Senate will take up the broader defense bill soon.

On Wednesday, senators narrowly rejected one resolution to disapprove of the F-35 sales, 47-49, and the other over the sale of armed drones, 46-50, in procedural votes largely along party lines. That’s far short of the two-thirds majority that would have been needed to overcome a potential presidential veto.

Action is halted for now, though the House, where Democrats have control, would likely be able to pass them easily.

Sen. Chris Murphy, D-Conn., said the UAE’s track record in war-torn Yemen and Libya and its “complicated” relationships with China and Russia raise more questions than answers.

“I’m not here to say that we shouldn’t be in the security business with UAE,” said Murphy, a member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.

But, he said, “without resolving those issues, is this the moment to be selling for the first time ever F-35s, armed drones into the heart of the Middle East?”

The arms sale emerged after the U.S. brokered the Abraham Accords to normalize relations between the UAE, Bahrain and Israel.

In notifying Congress last month, Pompeo said the authorization of the sale was in recognition of the “deepening relationship” with the UAE and its need to deter threats from Iran.

Pompeo said the “historic agreement” reached with the Abraham Accords offered a “once-in-a-generation opportunity” to transform the region’s “strategic landscape.”

The sale, worth up to $23.37 billion, includes dozens of F-35s, advanced armed drone systems and a package of air-to-air and air-to-ground munitions.

Sen. Bob Menendez of New Jersey, the top Democrat on the Foreign Relations Committee, said a list of questions senators sent to Pompeo and then-Defense Secretary Mark Esper about the arrangement remains unanswered.

A classified briefing for senators did not appear to adequately answer their questions.

“We must assert our congressional prerogative,” Menendez said. Voting “sends a message to the executive branch.”

“The UAE is and will continue to be a critical security partner of the United States. We commend the UAE’s decision to recognize and establish full diplomatic relations with Israel through the signing of the Abraham Accords on September 15, 2020. We appreciate that the UAE and Israel have been building political and economic ties that can ultimately make the region more secure.

“Our vote for this resolution of disapproval should not be construed as general opposition to a closer military relationship with the UAE and we remain open to considering support of the sale of advanced capabilities, including the F-35 and MQ-9, provided such sales are subject to sufficient congressional review. Congress has a long-established and rigorous review process for these types of arms sales in order to ensure that they are consistent with the national security objectives of the U.S. and our allies, aligned with our values, and fully consider any potential unintended consequences.

“Unfortunately, the Trump administration has once again tried to circumvent and undermine congressional oversight responsibilities while rushing through these sales in the final days of the administration. Many aspects of this proposed sale remain conceptual and we are being asked to support a significant transfer of advanced U.S. technology without clarity on a number of key details regarding the sale or sufficient answers to critical national security questions. Especially with a sale of this magnitude and sensitivity, Congress must exercise its oversight role to ensure proper safeguards of U.S. technology are in place.

“When sales go through the regular congressional process, foreign countries can be assured that it is the entire U.S. government supporting them. It makes the relationship deeper and more reliable.

“Unfortunately, the Trump administration has not given Congress the opportunity or information we need to consider the sale in a thoughtful and deliberate manner.”

Joint statement from Sens. Mark Warner, Bob Menendez and Jack Reed on UAE Defense Sale

Israeli officials have previously expressed some concern about an F-35 sale. But in October, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu appeared to confirmIsrael’s consent.

Even after Wednesday’s setback, Congress is poised to approve the sweeping annual defense bill despite Trump’s objections.

Trump has warned he would veto the bill over a provision to study stripping the names of Confederate leaders from U.S. military bases. He also wants lawmakers to include an unrelated provision to clamp down on the big technology companies over what Republicans, and some Democrats, say is unfair treatment on social media platforms like Twitter and Facebook. But lawmakers say the tech provision doesn’t belong in the defense policy bill.

Sen. Tim Kaine (D-Va.) also issued a statement on the AUE arms sale resolutions.

“Today I voted in favor of two Senate Resolutions disapproving the Trump Administration’s recently announced arms sale to the United Arab Emirates. While I believe that the UAE is an important US ally, Congress needs to review the details of arms transfers before they are finalized. In this case, Congress has not seen the details because the Administration has yet to conclude its discussions with the UAE about what protections should be in place. The right approach is for the US and UAE to finalize the transfer agreement, including provisions to ensure the security of American technology, allow Congress to review such provisions and then make a decision about the transfer. I am confident we can work out an acceptable set of protections, but I am unwilling to green light this arms sale until we do.”

Sen. Tim Kaine, (D-Va.)

___

Associated Press Diplomatic Writer Matthew Lee contributed to this report.

Copyright 2021 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Trending Stories

WAVY Twitter Widget

***Don’t Miss Module Removal CSS***

WAVY Facebook