Updated: Sunday, 22 Nov 2009, 7:23 PM EST
Published : Sunday, 22 Nov 2009, 7:23 PM EST
WASHINGTON (AP) - Moderate Senate Democrats threatened Sunday to scuttle
health-care legislation if their demands aren't met, while more
liberal members warned their party leaders not to bend.
The dispute among Democrats foretells of a rowdy floor debate
next month on legislation that would extend health care coverage to
roughly 31 million Americans. Republicans have already made clear
they aren't supporting the bill.
Final passage is in jeopardy, even after the chamber's
historic 60-39 vote Saturday night to begin debate.
"I don't want a big-government, Washington-run operation that
would undermine the ... private insurance that 200 million
Americans now have," said Sen. Ben Nelson, a conservative Nebraska
Democrat.
Nelson and three other moderates -- Democratic Sens. Mary
Landrieu of Louisiana and Blanche Lincoln of Arkansas and
Connecticut independent Joe Lieberman -- agreed to open debate
despite expressing reservations on the measure. Each of them has
warned that they might not support the final bill.
One major sticking point is a provision that would allow
Americans to buy a federal-run insurance plan if their state allows
it. Moderates say they worry the so-called public option will
become a huge and costly entitlement program and that other
requirements in the bill could cripple businesses.
"I don't want to fix the problems in our health care system
in a way that creates more of an economic crisis," said Lieberman.
The sway held by such a small group of senators has annoyed
their more liberal colleagues, who could vote against a final bill
if it becomes too watered down.
Sen. Sherrod Brown, D-Ohio, said he didn't think
rank-and-file Democrats would feel compelled to go that far. At the
same time, Brown warned Democratic leaders not to make too many
concessions.
"I don't want four Democratic senators dictating to the other
56 of us and to the rest of the country -- when the public option
has this much support -- that (a public option is) not going to be
in it," said Brown.
The Senate bill would require most Americans to carry
insurance and provide subsidies to those who couldn't afford it.
Large companies could incur costs if they did not provide coverage
to their work force. The insurance industry would come under
significant new regulation under the bill, which would first ease
and then ban the practice of denying coverage on the basis of
pre-existing medical conditions.
Congressional budget analysts put the legislation's cost at
$979 billion over a decade and say it would reduce deficits over
the same period while extending coverage to 94 percent of the
eligible population.
The House approved its version of the bill earlier this month
on a near party-line vote of 220-215.
Sen. Dick Durbin of Illinois, the No. 2 Democrat in the
Senate, said the health care bill must be passed by the end of the
year so that President Barack Obama and lawmakers can shift their
attention to the economy and improving employment rates.
Such a timeline also would enable Obama to claim victory on a
major domestic priority when he delivers his State of the Union
speech in January.
But with one-third of Senate seats up for election in 2010,
politics will factor heavily into the outcome of the debate on
health care.
Sen. Michael Bennet, a junior Democrat who will be seeking
his first full term next year in Colorado, where many districts
lean conservative, said he would support the health care overhaul
even if doing so means losing his seat.
"The thing that our working families need more than anything
else is to end these double-digit cost increases that they're
having every single year with health insurance," Bennet said.
Democratic Sen. Chuck Schumer of New York said he believes
there are enough votes to include a public insurance option in the
bill as long as states are allowed to opt out. To do so, all 58
Democrats and independent Sens. Lieberman and Bernie Sanders of
Vermont would have to support it.
Sanders issued a statement Sunday saying, "I strongly suspect
that there are a number of senators, including myself, who would
not support final passage without a strong public option."
Lieberman and Nelson have said they object to the public
option. On Sunday, Nelson said he is open to negotiating the
provision; he said he would prefer allowing states to opt into the
program, instead of having to remove themselves.
Senate GOP leader Mitch McConnell said the lingering
reservations by moderate Democrats indicate that the party's
leaders have gone too far. On Saturday, no Republican voted to
begin debate on the bill, which they said would cripple industry
and drive up costs for the average American.
"I believe there are a number of Democratic senators who do
care what the American people think and are not interested in this
sort of arrogant approach that everybody sort of shut up and sit
down, get out of the way, we know what's best for you," said
McConnell.
Brown, Bennet and McConnell appeared on CNN's "State of the
Union." Lieberman appeared on NBC's "Meet the Press." Nelson
appeared on ABC's "This Week."
Opinions that are derogatory, attack other users or are offensive in nature may be removed. WAVY is not responsible for the content posted in this comment section. We reserve the right to remove any offensive or off-topic remark or thread. To mark a comment for review by a moderator, click "Report Abuse."