A Yemeni man charged with piracy for his role in the hijacking …
An eighth Somali man has pleaded guilty to piracy for his role …
A seventh Somali man has pleaded guilty to piracy for his role …
Jurors have concluded a full day of deliberations in Virginia …
A federal prosecutor told a jury Wednesday that five Somali men…
Five Somali men accused of firing assault rifles at a Navy ship…
The U.S. government is appealing a federal judge's decision to …
A judge in Norfolk is set to hear defense motions in the case …
A Somali man pleaded guilty Friday to piracy-related charges …
A federal judge in Norfolk has dismissed piracy charges against…
Three Somali men being prosecuted on U.S. piracy charges say …
A federal grand jury has returned new charges against 11 Somali…
Attorneys for six Somali nationals who allegedly attacked a …
Piracy charges against six Somali nationals should be dismissed…
One of 11 Somali nationals accused of attacking U.S. Navy ships…
Updated: Monday, 03 May 2010, 9:29 AM EDT
Published : Friday, 30 Apr 2010, 9:15 PM EDT
NORFOLK, Va. (WAVY) - The alleged pirate attacks happened half a world away, off the coast of Africa. So why is this case being tried in Norfolk?
The last time someone was prosecuted for piracy in the U.S. was in 1937, in a case that involved an attack on a gambling boat off the coast of California.
The current case involves alleged attacks on U.S. Naval vessels by foreign nationals, bringing piracy into the U.S. judicial system once again.
There is no real government structure in Somalia, and the African nation of Kenya says its court system is becoming overburdened with these cases. Other nations cite what has been referred to as "thorny jurisdiction issues".
"I've heard that comment..." says Norfolk attorney Marc Marling
As the former U.S. Counsel for a French shipping company that has had its own dealings with pirates, Marling is familiar with the complexities of maritime law when it comes to prosecuting acts of piracy.
He cites the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea that allows "any State to seize and prosecute pirates..." although the United States has not signed the Convention.
The U.S. is a member of the International Maritime Organization, which has a convention that says "one State can seize a pirate and turn him over to another State for prosecution..."
"So the taking of a U.S. ship would confer jurisdiction and the attack on U-S sailors would confer jurisdiction in the U.S.," Marling said.
But why hold the trial in Norfolk?
"I don't believe there's anything particularly special about Norfolk, except perhaps the fact that these two vessels are home-ported here," Marling said. "So there seem to be a logical jurisdictional place here."
Critics ask if the U.S. judicial system should invest time and money prosecuting pirates from another country.
"To the extent that we choose to prosecute under our piracy laws any alleged pirates who commit acts against U-S citizens," says Marling. "I think that falls squarely within one of the basic tenants of why we have a legal system in this country."
Opinions that are derogatory, attack other users or are offensive in nature may be removed. WAVY is not responsible for the content posted in this comment section. We reserve the right to remove any offensive or off-topic remark or thread. To mark a comment for review by a moderator, click "Flag as inappropriate."